Return to the home page. top banner right
top banner bottom
Click to search.
members
Login:
Password:
Click to login
Click for Log In Help
Click to Join the Society
 
 
 
 
Click for the Heart Rhythm Foundation
Click for the IBHRE (formerly NASPExAM)
Click for Professional Education
Click for Health Policy
 
 
 
 
 
Click for Clinical Guidance
Click for Research
Click for News & Information
Click for Scientific Sessions
Click for the HRS Calendar
Click for the HeartRhythm Journal
Click for the HRS Store
Click to Find a Specialist
Click for Patient Information
Click for About HRS
Click for Membership
Click for Career Center
Click for the AF 360° Resource Center
Click for the SCA 360° Resource Center
titlelines Society Comments on 2010 MPFS Final Rule
The Heart Rhythm Society, in response to the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule final rule for calendar year 2010, has focused its comments on the elimination of the consultation codes and the use of the American Medical Association Physician Practice Information Survey data to calculate practice expense inputs.
content_line

Society Comments on 2010 MPFS Final Rule

On December 23, 2009 the Heart Rhythm Society issued comments to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in response to the final rule "Medicare Program; Payment Policies Under the Physician Fee Schedule and Other Revisions to Part B for CY 2010" as published in the Federal Register on November 25, 2009.
         Read the Society's 12/23 comment letter » (PDF, 380K)

While a number of provisions were adopted in the final rule, the Society’s comments focused on two issues of critical importance to our members — the elimination of the consultation codes and the use of the American Medical Association Physician Practice Information Survey (PPIS) data to calculate practice expense inputs.

Consultation Services

In the final rule, CMS chose to finalize its proposal to eliminate all consultation codes, except for those used in the delivery of telehealth services, citing longstanding confusion due to differences between Medicare guidelines and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) guidelines.

Under the new policy, effective January 1, 2010, CMS will no longer recognize Evaluation and Management (E/M) consultation codes 99241-99244 for office/outpatient services and 99251-99255 for inpatient hospital services. Rather, CMS has instructed physicians to use E/M codes for new or established office/outpatient services or initial hospital care.

In our comments, we alerted CMS to the adverse affects that elimination of consultation codes will have on the delivery of services and quality of care for Medicare patients and urged the agency to refrain from implementing the provision.

Practice Expense

Also in the final rule, CMS adopted its proposal to utilize data from the PPIS to calculate practice expense per hour (PE/HR) rates for cardiology services.

In our comments on both the proposed and final rulemaking, we strongly urged CMS to continue use of the supplemental survey data submitted by the American College of Cardiology until further evaluation of the PPIS data has been conducted, due to concerns with validity of the survey process and the quality of data collected for cardiology.

We firmly believe that CMS’ decision to enact payment policy changes prior to further analysis and validation of the PPIS data will surely exacerbate access problems, and severely affect the quality of care for Medicare patients.

The Society remains strongly opposed to both policy changes and will continue its legislative and regulatory efforts to overturn CMS’ decision. We will keep you informed of these activities as they develop.

Click to Email Page. Click to Print Page.
Click to Contact Us.Click for the Site Map.
© Heart Rhythm Society | 1400 K St. NW, Suite 500 | Washington DC 20005 | (202) 464-3400 | Fax: (202) 464-3401 | Privacy Policy